The relationship between attention and consciousness: an expanded taxonomy and implications for 'no-report' paradigms.
Michael Pitts, Lydia A Lutsyshyna, Steven A. Hillyard
Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences September 19, 2018 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0348 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Review Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Access consciousness No-report paradigms Perceptual awareness Phenomenal consciousness Recurrent processing theory |
| Citations | 135 |
| Key findings | Both global neuronal workspace theory and recurrent processing theory contain key insights that can be reconciled into a novel framework incorporating an updated taxonomy of conscious and non-conscious states based on attentional mechanisms. |
Abstract
Tensions between global neuronal workspace theory and recurrent processing theory have sparked much debate in the field of consciousness research. Here, we focus on one of the key distinctions between these theories: the proposed relationship between attention and consciousness. By reviewing recent empirical evidence, we argue that both theories contain key insights and that certain aspects of each theory can be reconciled into a novel framework that may help guide future research. Alternative theories are also considered, including attended intermediate-level representations theory, integrated information theory and higher order thought theory. With the aim of offering a fresh and nuanced perspective to current theoretical debates, an updated taxonomy of conscious and non-conscious states is proposed. This framework maps a wider spectrum of conscious states by incorporating contemporary views from cognitive neuroscience regarding the variety of attentional mechanisms that are known to interact with sensory processing. Whether certain types of attention are necessary for phenomenal and access consciousness is considered and incorporated into this extended taxonomy. To navigate this expanded space, we review recent 'no-report' paradigms and address several methodological misunderstandings in order to pave a clear path forward for identifying the neural basis of perceptual awareness.This article is part of the theme issue 'Perceptual consciousness and cognitive access'.
Citations in the library
Cited by 50
- ERP and MEG correlates of visual consciousness: The second decade. Consciousness and Cognition April 1, 2020
- Animal sentience Philosophy Compass March 17, 2022
- An academic survey on theoretical foundations, common assumptions and the current state of consciousness science Neuroscience of Consciousness 2022
- Consciousness and the fallacy of misplaced objectivity. Neuroscience of Consciousness 2021
- Human high-order thalamic nuclei gate conscious perception through the thalamofrontal loop. Science April 4, 2025
and 45 more in the library
Cites 39
- The Brain's Default Mode Network Annual Review of Neuroscience May 4, 2015
- On a confusion about a function of consciousness Behavioral and Brain Sciences June 1, 1995
- Neural correlates of consciousness: progress and problems Nature Reviews Neuroscience April 20, 2016
- Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences December 1, 2007
- Distilling the neural correlates of consciousness Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews December 17, 2011
and 34 more in the library