Skip to content

Comparing Substance Use Consequences between Serotonergic Psychedelics, MDMA, and other Drugs of Abuse Among United States Adults with History of Psychiatric Illness

Joshua C. Black, Nicole Schow, Hannah L. Burkett, Morgan Pena, Jennifer S. Jewell, Annika Czizik, Andrew A. Monte, Richard C. Dart

International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction April 1, 2025 DOI: 10.1007/s11469-023-01163-2 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Cross-sectional survey Peer reviewed
Population US adults with psychiatric illness history (anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, bipolar disorder)
Topics LSD MDMA Psilocybin Serotonin
Keywords Psychedelics Psychiatric illness Us population
Citations 3
Key findings Psychedelic or MDMA use among adults with psychiatric illness is more prevalent than in the general population and is associated with more severe substance use disorder risk, though the increase is smaller than for opioids or stimulants.

Abstract

Psychedelic-assisted therapy could transform treating psychiatric illness, but harms from exacerbating substance use disorder (SUD) among adults with psychiatric illness using psychedelics have not been studied. A cross-sectional survey in the US was used to test whether Drug Abuse Screening Test scores (DAST-10, validated instrument predicting SUD) were more severe when psychiatric illnesses (anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder [MDD], post-traumatic stress disorder [PTSD], and bipolar disorder) and serotonergic psychedelic or MDMA use were combined. Any psychedelic use among adults with psychiatric illness history (anxiety: 5.1% [95% CI: 4.7, 5.6]; MDD: 5.1% [4.3, 5.8]; PTSD: 6.9% [5.9, 7.9]; bipolar: 9.2% [8.0, 10.5]) was more prevalent than the general population (2.6% [2.5, 2.8]). Significant increases in scores were associated with psychedelic use independent of other concurrent drug use, but increases were smaller than for opioids or stimulants. Approaches to managing SUD risks with psychedelics should differ from past approaches for other drugs.

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on MDMA, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Recreational MDMA use in Sydney: a profile of ‘Ecstasy’ users and their experiences with the drug Recreational Ecstasy users recruited via snowball peer network 1992 Cross-sectional survey n = 100
Reducedin vivobinding to the serotonin transporter in the cerebral cortex of MDMA (‘ecstasy’) users Male regular ecstasy users and well-matched controls 1999 Cross-sectional association study n = 20
Patterns of simultaneous polysubstance use in drug using university students Drug-using university students 2006 Cross-sectional survey n = 149
Patterns of recreational drug use at dance events in Edinburgh, Scotland Drug users at dance events in Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, aged 16-47, 80% between 18 and... 2001 Cross-sectional survey n = 122
Acute, sub‐acute and long‐term subjective consequences of ‘ecstasy’ (MDMA) consumption in 430 regular users Regular MDMA users 2003 Cross-sectional study n = 466

Citations in the library

Explore topics