Skip to content

A Scoping Review of Research in Naturalistic Studies with Psychedelics.

Laura C. Carvalho, Jorge Encantado, Hannes Kettner, Christopher Timmerman, Diogo Veiga, Pedro J. Teixeira

Journal of Psychoactive Drugs June 28, 2025 DOI: 10.1080/02791072.2025.2520221 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review Longitudinal Cross-sectional Peer reviewed
Sample size 103
Population Naturalistic psychedelic studies
Keywords Naturalistic research Real-world data Psychedelics: ayahuasca Entheogens Hallucinogens Psychedelic substances Observational studies Field research Real-world evidence Ceremonial settings: setting Context Traditional use Indigenous practices
Citations 6
Key findings Ayahuasca was the most frequently studied substance (66%) and ceremonial settings were the most commonly reported context (35.9%), but sample characteristics varied widely and contextual details were often underreported.

Abstract

Psychedelic research has traditionally focused on controlled, clinical settings to evaluate the therapeutic potential of substances such as psilocybin. However, in recent years, there has been growing interest in naturalistic research, which explores psychedelic use in real-world settings. This review aims to critically analyze trends in naturalistic psychedelic research, focusing on sample demographics and the diversity of contextual factors across different settings. A systematic search in PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science was conducted, including studies that involved the use of classic psychedelics in real-world settings. Two reviewers independently screened articles and extracted data on both sample and setting characteristics. A total of 103 studies were included, most of which employed a cross-sectional survey-based design (n = 54), with sample characteristics being widely reported, albeit with considerable variability across studies. Ayahuasca was the most frequently studied substance (66%), and ceremonial settings were the most commonly reported (35.9%). While sample characteristics were widely reported, there was significant variability. Specific contextual components, such as music, were often underreported, with longitudinal studies providing the most comprehensive details. This review highlights the need for systematic reporting standards in naturalistic psychedelic research to maximize its complementary value alongside clinical trials.

Citations in the library

Explore topics