Skip to content

Construct Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Meditating and Nonmeditating Samples

Ruth A. Baer, Gregory T. Smith, Emily L. B. Lykins, Daniel Button, Jennifer Krietemeyer, Shannon Sauer, Erin C. Walsh, Danielle S. Duggan, J. Mark G. Williams

Assessment February 29, 2008 DOI: 10.1177/1073191107313003 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Cross-sectional study Peer reviewed
Population Experienced meditators and nonmeditating comparison groups
Topics Meditation
Citations 2,933
Key findings Most mindfulness facets were significantly related to meditation experience and to psychological symptoms and well-being, and several facets independently predicted well-being and mediated the relationship between meditation experience and well-being.

Abstract

Previous research on assessment of mindfulness by self-report suggests that it may include five component skills: observing, describing, acting with awareness, nonjudging of inner experience, and nonreactivity to inner experience. These elements of mindfulness can be measured with the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ). The authors investigated several aspects of the construct validity of the FFMQ in experienced meditators and nonmeditating comparison groups. Consistent with predictions, most mindfulness facets were significantly related to meditation experience and to psychological symptoms and well-being. As expected, relationships between the observing facet and psychological adjustment varied with meditation experience. Regression and mediation analyses showed that several of the facets contributed independently to the prediction of well-being and significantly mediated the relationship between meditation experience and well-being. Findings support the construct validity of the FFMQ in a combination of samples not previously investigated.

In the evidence

This study is part of the evidence base for a synthesis in the library. Here is how each one recorded it.

  • Most mindfulness facets were related to meditation experience and to psychological symptoms and well-being, and several facets mediated the relationship between meditation experience and well-being.

    Synthesized

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Neural Correlates of Dispositional Mindfulness During Affect Labeling Adult participants 2007 Observational cross-sectional n = 27
Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: Development and validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). School-aged children and adolescents 2011 Cross-sectional validation study n = 1,413
Mindfulness and self-compassion as predictors of psychological wellbeing in long-term meditators and matched nonmeditators Experienced meditators and demographically matched nonmeditators 2012 Cross-sectional study n = 152
Mechanisms of Action in the Inverse Relationship Between Mindfulness and Psychological Distress Undergraduates 2008 Cross-sectional, correlational
Impact of meditation training on the default mode network during a restful state 13 experienced meditators (over 1000 h of training) and 11 beginner meditators (no... 2012 Cross-sectional study n = 24

Citations in the library

Explore topics