Skip to content

Microdosing psychedelics: personality, mental health, and creativity differences in microdosers

Thomas Anderson, Rotem Petranker, Daniel Rosenbaum, Cory R. Weissman, Lê-Anh Dinh-Williams, Katrina Hui, Emma Hapke, Norman A. S. Farb

Psychopharmacology January 2, 2019 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-018-5106-2 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Observational study Preregistered Peer reviewed
Population Respondents recruited from online forums
Intervention Microdosing psychedelics
Topics Microdosing
Keywords Creativity Mental health Personality Clinical psychology Psychotherapist
Citations 171
Key findings Current and former microdosers scored lower on dysfunctional attitudes and negative emotionality and higher on wisdom, open-mindedness, and creativity compared to non-microdosing controls.

Abstract

RationaleMicrodosing psychedelics-the regular consumption of small amounts of psychedelic substances such as LSD or psilocybin-is a growing trend in popular culture. Recent studies on full-dose psychedelic psychotherapy reveal promising benefits for mental well-being, especially for depression and end-of-life anxiety. While full-dose therapies include perception-distorting properties, microdosing mayprovide complementary clinical benefits using lower-risk, non-hallucinogenic doses.ObjectivesThis pre-registered study aimed to investigate whether microdosing psychedelics is related to differences in personality, mental health, and creativity.MethodsIn this observational study, respondents recruited from online forums self-reported their microdosing behaviors and completed questionnaires concerning dysfunctional attitudes, wisdom, negative emotionality, open-mindedness, and mood. Respondents also performed the Unusual Uses Task to assess their creativity.ResultsCurrent and former microdosers scored lower on measures of dysfunctional attitudes (p < 0.001, r = - 0.92) and negative emotionality (p = 0.009, r = - 0.85) and higher on wisdom (p < 0.001, r = 0.88), openmindedness(p = 0.027, r = 0.67), and creativity (p < 0.001, r = 0.15) when compared to non-microdosing controls.ConclusionsThese findings provide promising initial evidence that warrants controlled experimental research to directly test safety and clinical efficacy. As microdoses are easier to administer than full-doses, this new paradigm has the exciting potential to shape future psychedelic research.

In the evidence

This study is part of the evidence base for a synthesis in the library. Here is how each one recorded it.

  • Current and former microdosers scored lower on dysfunctional attitudes and negative emotionality and higher on wisdom, open-mindedness, and creativity than non-microdosing controls.

    Synthesized

Comparable studies

Other observational and cohort studies on microdosing, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Positive expectations predict improved mental-health outcomes linked to psychedelic microdosing Individuals planning a weekly microdosing regimen 2021 Prospective observational study n = 81
Might Microdosing Psychedelics Be Safe and Beneficial? An Initial Exploration. More than a thousand individuals from 59 countries 2019 Observational cohort n = 1,000
Psilocybin microdosers demonstrate greater observed improvements in mood and mental health at one month relative to non-microdosing controls Psilocybin microdosers and non-microdosing comparators 2022 Naturalistic observational study n = 1,133
Nonlinear Pharmacokinetics of Oral Quinidine and Verapamil in Healthy Subjects: A Clinical Microdosing Study Healthy subjects 2011 Observational cohort
Microdosing with psychedelics to self-medicate for ADHD symptoms in adults: A prospective naturalistic study. Adults with ADHD who intended to start microdosing on their own initiative 2022 Prospective study n = 233

Citations in the library

Cited by 130

and 125 more in the library

Cites 18

and 13 more in the library

Explore topics