Skip to content

Should we be leery of being Leary? Concerns about psychedelic use by psychedelic researchers.

Brent M Kious, Zach Schwartz, Benjamin R. Lewis

Journal of Psychopharmacology 2023 DOI: 10.1177/02698811221133461 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics MDMA Psilocybin
Keywords Research ethics Research-ethics Psychedelic-research Scientific-objectivity Researcher-bias Drug-experimentation
Citations 44
Key points Argues that personal use of psychedelics by researchers could threaten scientific objectivity and ethical conduct, and proposes strategies to reduce perceived conflicts of interest.

Abstract

Psychedelic research is proceeding rapidly, despite ongoing legal and regulatory barriers and lingering questions about study design, such as the difficulty of ensuring adequate blinding, the relative overrepresentation in studies of participants who have previously used psychedelics, and the importance of personal experience with psychedelics for those who provide psychedelic-assisted therapy. Here we wish to explore a distinct concern: whether personal use of psychedelics by researchers could threaten the objectivity and ethical conduct of psychedelic research itself. In 2020, Anderson et al. suggested that psychedelic use could lead even "conservative individuals to become wildly enthusiastic about the potentials of psychedelics to heal and transform". Recent popular press criticisms of psychedelic science, in particular critiques of the MAPS Phase II and Phase III MDMA-Assisted Therapy trials for PTSD, have also raised questions about whether personal use of psychedelic drugs by psychedelic therapists could compromise scientific objectivity, lead to the exploitation of research subjects, or promote biased reporting of results. Here, we elaborate on and attempt to delimit these concerns, with the goal of informing policy related to psychedelic research and the eventual clinical use of psychedelics. In particular, we explore whether the possibility that psychedelic use can directly and positively affect investigators' enthusiasm about psychedelics themselves raises concerns about bias and scientific integrity. We then discuss several practical strategies to reduce perceived conflict of interest.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on MDMA, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Differences Between the Mechanism of Action of MDMA, MBDB, and the Classic Hallucinogens. Identification of a New Therapeutic Class: Entactogens 1986 Theoretical or philosophical paper
The Background and Chemistry of MDMA 1986 Historical analysis
The origin of MDMA (ecstasy) revisited: the true story reconstructed from the original documents* Original documents in Merck's historical archive in Darmstadt, Germany, years 1900–1960 2006 Historical analysis
Distinct neural mechanisms for the prosocial and rewarding properties of MDMA 2019 Theoretical or philosophical paper
How could MDMA (ecstasy) help anxiety disorders? A neurobiological rationale 2009 Theoretical or philosophical paper

Citations in the library

Explore topics