Discriminative stimulus effects of the optical isomers of 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA)
Jonathan M. Broadbent, J. B. Appel, E. K. Michael, J. H. Ricker
Behavioural Pharmacology October 1, 1992 DOI: 10.1097/00008877-199210000-00003 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Animal discrimination study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Rats |
| Interventions | (-) MDA (+) MDA LSD DOM mescaline (+) amphetamine cocaine pirenpirone SCH-23390 (-) sulpiride |
| Dose | 1.25 mg/kg for training doses of (-) MDA and (+) MDA; 0.16 mg/kg for LSD; 1.0 mg/kg for (+) amphetamine |
| Duration | At least 90 min for maintained drug-appropriate responding |
| Keywords | Stimulus control Discriminative model Stimulus psychology Artificial intelligence Cognitive psychology |
| Citations | 18 |
| Key points | The left-handed isomer of MDA has more hallucinogen-like and serotonin-mediated effects than the right-handed isomer, and neither isomer has potent amphetamine-like effects. |
Abstract
The isomers of 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) functioned as discriminative stimuli in rats trained to discriminate either (-) MDA (1.25mg/kg) or (+) MDA (1.25mg/kg) from saline. Dose- and time-response curves indicated that drug lever selection occurred at doses of at least 1.00mg/kg of (-) MDA and 0.75mg/kg of (+) MDA and that drug-appropriate responding for both isomers was maintained for at least 90min. Cross-substitution was observed between the MDA isomers; both (+) and (-) 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) also substituted completely for (+) and (-) MDA. The hallucinogens (+)-lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) and (+/-)-2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM), substituted for (-) MDA; neither mescaline nor (+) amphetamine or cocaine had (-) MDA-like effects. LSD also substituted for (+) MDA; DOM, mescaline, (+) amphetamine and cocaine failed to have (+) MDA-like effects. The (-) but not the (+) MDA cue was blocked by the 5-HT(2) antagonist pirenpirone; the dopamine (DA) antagonists SCH-23390 and (-) sulpiride had no effect on either the (-) or (+) MDA cues. When animals were trained to discriminate LSD (0.16mg/kg) or (+) amphetamine (1.0mg/kg) from saline, neither (-) MDA nor (+) MDA substituted completely. These results indicate that: (1) the stimulus effects of the isomers of MDA and MDMA are similar; (2) (-) MDA may be more hallucinogenic (or more accurately, LSD- or DOM-like) than (+) MDA; (3) neither (+) nor (-) MDA has potent amphetamine-like effects; and (4) the effects of (-) MDA may be more serotonergic than those of (+) MDA.
Citations in the library
Cited by 8
- A three-choice discrimination procedure dissociates the discriminative stimulus effects of d-amphetamine and (±)-MDMA in rats. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 2000
- Serotonin Transporter Blockade Reduces the Psychedelic-Like Effects of 4-Methoxy- N -methyl- N -isopropyltryptamine and Related Analogs ACS Chemical Neuroscience May 27, 2026
- Generalization of serotonin and dopamine ligands to the discriminative stimulus effects of different doses of ±3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine. Behavioural Pharmacology June 1, 2017
- Designer drugs: a medicinal chemistry perspective. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences February 2012
- Comparison of the discriminative stimulus effects of dimethyltryptamine with different classes of psychoactive compounds in rats Psychopharmacology July 1, 2009
and 3 more in the library