Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Determination of LSD in Urine With High-Performance Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry

Karl Bodin, Jan‐olof Svensson

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring August 1, 2001 DOI: 10.1097/00007691-200108000-00011 (opens in new tab) via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

A method using high-performance liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry can reliably detect LSD in urine at concentrations as low as 0.02 ng/mL. The procedure involves extracting LSD from urine into an organic solvent, then back-extracting into an acetate buffer, followed by separation and detection. A trideuterated form of LSD serves as an internal standard to improve accuracy. The method shows consistent results, with measurement variability of 3.5% within a day and 4.0% between days, and recovers 91% of LSD from samples. The calibration curve is linear across 0.05 to 10 ng/mL, making it suitable for routine testing.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Method development and validation Peer reviewed
Keywords Mass spectrometry Detection limit Extraction chemistry High-performance liquid chromatography Electrospray ionization
Citations 11
Key finding The developed method can detect LSD in urine down to 0.02 ng/mL with high precision and recovery.

Abstract

A rapid, specific, and sensitive high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry method has been developed for routine determination of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) in urine. It includes sample purification by extraction into an organic solvent and back-extraction to an acetate buffer, reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography, and detection with a single quadrupole mass spectrometer equipped with an atmospheric pressure ionization electrospray interface. Trideuterated LSD was used as internal standard. The limit of detection was 0.02 ng/mL and the calibration curve was linear from 0.05 to 10 ng/mL. Within-and between-day coefficients of variation were 3.5% and 4.0% respectively and extraction recovery was 91%.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment