A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Among People Recovering from Mental Illness: A Tailored Mindfulness-Based Intervention versus Relaxation Training.
Yi Ting Daphne Cheng, Kim Wan Daniel Young, Per Carlbring, Yat Nam Ng, Suet Lin Shirley Hung
Journal of evidence-based social work (2019) 2024 DOI: 10.1080/26408066.2023.2281418 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Pilot mixed methods randomized controlled trial Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 28 |
| Population | People with mental illness |
| Intervention | Relaxation training |
| Duration | Post-intervention and one-month follow-up |
| Topics | Meditation |
| Keywords | Mental illness Mindfulness-based intervention Mixed methods Relaxation Self-compassion |
| Citations | 2 |
| Key findings | The tailored mindfulness-based intervention (REMIND 2.0) led to significant and sustained improvements in personal recovery and multiple well-being outcomes compared to relaxation training, except for anxiety and stress. |
Abstract
This study assessed the potential effectiveness, acceptability and feasibility of a tailored mindfulness-based intervention (MBI, REMIND 2.0) for personal recovery among people with mental illness during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this pilot mixed methods randomized controlled trial, participants were assigned to either the MBI (n = 14) or the relaxation training (RT) (n = 14). Quantitative measures were used to assess primary outcomes, including personal recovery, mindfulness, self-compassion, resilience, and secondary outcomes, including depression, stress, anxiety, positive and negative moods, quality of life and general health at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1) and one-month follow-up (T2). Quantitative interviews were conducted to explore the experiences and perceptions toward the MBI. Results indicated significant group and time interactions for all outcomes except anxiety and stress. MBI participants showed significant improvements in all outcomes at T1, which were maintained at T2, except for positive mood. RT participants showed a significant decline in resilience but significant improvements in all secondary outcomes at T1, but all outcomes significantly declined at T2, except for anxiety and stress. MBI participants were receptive toward the programme in all aspects of personal recovery. The tailored MBI is a potentially effective, feasible and acceptable approach to facilitate personal recovery among people with mental illness. Differences between MBI and RT are discussed.