Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Substance Use & Misuse

ISSN 1532-2491

27 papers in the library · 505 citations · publishing 2002-2026

Papers

MDMB-CHMICA: Availability, Patterns of Use, and Toxicity Associated With This Novel Psychoactive Substance.

Substance Use & Misuse January 28, 2017 Mark Haden, John R H Archer, Paul I Dargan et al.

MDMB-CHMICA, a synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonist found in recreational drug products across Europe since August 2014, is widely available from online suppliers. A systematic review of scientific literature and Internet sources identified 78 websites selling it, with prices decreasing for larger quantities. User reports on discussion forums from October 2014 onward described euphoria as the most common positive effect (30.6% of 36 reports), but almost all reports (91.7%) mentioned adverse effects, most frequently palpitations (30.6%), vomiting (25.0%), loss of consciousness (16.7%), visual hallucinations (16.7%), chest pain (13.9%), and anxiety (13.9%). Published literature includes two case reports of fatalities and one series of analytically confirmed intoxications. Both users and suppliers warn of its high potency.

Psychobiology of drug-induced religious experience: from the brain "locus of religion" to cognitive unbinding.

Substance Use & Misuse November 1, 2010 Paolo Nencini, Kathleen A Grant

Theories that religious experiences have an evolutionarily conserved biological basis may only apply to modern religious and cultural contexts, not to all historical beliefs. Culture strongly influences both the subjective effects of psychoactive drugs and religious thoughts, arguing against a common brain pathway uniquely responsible for these experiences. Personal beliefs, expectations, and experiences can bias the interpretation of drug-induced states as reflecting biologically based religious thought. Psychobiological research proposing specific brain mechanisms should consider anthropological and historical data. A model based on cognitive unbinding accommodates the evidence better than one positing a specific brain locus for religion.