Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Laura Schmalzl

3 papers in the library · 1,518 citations · publishing 2016-2018

Papers

Mind the Hype: A Critical Evaluation and Prescriptive Agenda for Research on Mindfulness and Meditation

Perspectives on Psychological Science October 10, 2017 Nicholas T. van Dam, Marieke K. van Vugt, David R. Vago et al. 1,500 citations

Mindfulness meditation has become widely used in therapy, corporate wellness, education, and the military, but the research backing it has faced criticism for poor methodology and misinformation. This article reviews the current state of mindfulness research, discussing difficulties in defining mindfulness, the proper scope of studies, and key methodological issues. The authors summarize what is known and unknown, offering a prescriptive agenda for contemplative science that focuses on assessment, training, possible adverse effects, and brain imaging. The goal is to inform scientists, media, and the public, minimize harm, curb poor research practices, and stop the spread of misinformation about mindfulness's benefits, costs, and future.

Editorial: Neural Mechanisms Underlying Movement-Based Embodied Contemplative Practices

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience April 26, 2016 Laura Schmalzl, C. Kerr 18 citations

Movement-based contemplative practices such as yoga, tai chi, the Feldenkrais Method, and dance have been shown to relieve symptoms of cancer, Parkinson's disease, chronic pain, fibromyalgia, PTSD, ADHD, depression, and anxiety, and to improve stress, cognition, physical function, and emotional states in healthy individuals. Despite these benefits, their neural mechanisms remain less studied than those of seated meditation, largely due to the challenge of investigating their combined movement, breath, and attention components. This Research Topic presents empirical data, theoretical frameworks, and clinical implications to advance understanding of the neurophysiological and neurocognitive mechanisms underlying these practices.

Reiterated Concerns and Further Challenges for Mindfulness and Meditation Research: A Reply to Davidson and Dahl.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science January 1, 2018 Nicholas T. van Dam, Marieke K. van Vugt, David R. Vago et al.

The authors reply to a commentary by Davidson and Dahl, agreeing with many suggestions but emphasizing that their original concerns remain especially relevant to mindfulness and meditation research. They highlight the vulnerability of this relatively young field compared to more mature scientific disciplines, discuss special characteristics of research participants, and stress the serious consequences of adverse experiences that a significant subset of individuals suffer during mindfulness and other contemplative practices. They also scrutinize common applications of mindfulness and meditation to illness and introduce caveats regarding mobile technologies for guiding contemplative practices.