Skip to content

Neurophenomenology and Transpersonal Studies

Charles D. Laughlin, Adam J. Rock, Jenny Wade

Wiley eBooks August 20, 2026 DOI: 10.1002/9781394215683.ch17 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Philosophy of mind
Key points Argues that combining phenomenology and neuroscience into "neurophenomenology" is the most direct way to study the relation between consciousness and the nervous system, and that a naturalistic, introspective cultural neurophenomenology suited to cross-cultural and ethnographic fieldwork can generate but not verify theories about the neurophysiology driving experience; verification requires methods consonant with cognitive neurophenomenology.

Abstract

The most direct method for ascertaining the relations between consciousness and the nervous system is by combining the methods of phenomenology and neuroscience into a kind of neurophenomenology. In keeping with the field of anthropology, the value of neurophenomenology is naturalistic and introspective, and application is directed toward diverse subjects encountered in cross-cultural experience and comparison, especially as appropriate to ethnographic and applied fieldwork; e.g., consciousness, religion and spiritual practices. For cultural neurophenomenologists, the challenge is to acquire the requisite training in neuroscience, as well as learn to use transpersonal field methods to access the experiences had by one's non-Western hosts while in alternative states of consciousness. If only naturalistic methods are used in cultural neurophenomenology, conjectures or theory can be made about the neurophysiology driving experience, but verifying those conjectures will rely on methods more consonant with cognitive neurophenomenology.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on philosophy of mind, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics