You Are Here (Now)
Michael R. Caplan
Routledge eBooks November 22, 2023 DOI: 10.4324/9781003381150-8 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that Hillman and Giegerich share a view of psychology as lacking any external "Archimedean" point yet devoted to real phenomena, and proposes psychology as "syzygy"—a self-generating, self-subverting movement. The author contends that a "contra-natural realism" can return us to our nature and actual lives only by first subverting habitual thought and alienating us from the "day-world," as illustrated by his own youthful clinical depersonalization. |
Abstract
James Hillman and Wolfgang Giegerich always acknowledged each other’s contributions toward the advancement of what both considered foundational to C.G. Jung’s project: his insight into psyche’s uroboric logic, soul’s dialectical sense. Psychology therefore necessarily lacks an external “Archimedean” point from which to interpret ourselves and our world, yet it is at the same time absolutely dedicated to the real phenomena which appear to us (and as us). A truly psychological psychology is a contra-natural realism that can bring us home to our very nature and our actual lives, but not without initially subverting our every natural habit of thought and alienating us from the “day-world” perspective via what Hillman called the “underworld,” as illustrated through the author’s own youthful experience of clinical depersonalization. Alternately citing the words of Hillman and Giegerich, the essay brings into relief psychology as syzygy – an eternally revolutionary, self-generating, self-subverting movement. It examines, first, their shared idea of “soul” as methodological rather than substantial, then the duplicitous phenomenology of the dream, and finally the discipline of image as entryway to uroboric interiority, addressing as well the “divergence” sparked by Giegerich’s critique of Hillman in order to conclude with the question of psychology’s response to modernity.