Skip to content

Respiratory function in healthy long-term meditators: a systematic review.

L J U Karunarathne, W A D L Amarasiri, A D A Fernando

Systematic Reviews January 2, 2024 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02412-0 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review Cross-sectional Peer reviewed
Sample size 433
Population Healthy long-term meditators
Topics Meditation
Keywords Humans Cross-sectional studies Behavior therapy Health status Respiration Respiratory rate Spirometry Respiratory function Long-term meditation Healthy long-term meditators Meditation experience
Key findings Long-term meditators showed slower resting respiratory rate than controls (standardized mean difference -2.98, 95% CI -4.48 to -1.47) and slower breathing during meditation versus baseline, with greater meditation experience associated with slower rates. Peak expiratory flow rate was higher in meditators (mean difference 1.67), but tidal volume and vital capacity did not differ significantly from controls.

Abstract

Background: There is a paucity of data on effects of long-term meditation on respiration. This systematic review summarized selected respiratory function parameters in healthy long-term meditators (LTMs) at rest, during meditation and their associations with meditation practice variables.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE (Ovid), Scopus, Proquest Dissertation and Thesis Global databases, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar was performed from year 1950 to August 15th, 2023. Keywords "meditation," "long-term meditation," and respiratory/pulmonary/lung function and spirometry were used. Controlled-trials and observational studies exploring respiratory parameters in healthy LTMs published in English were included. Two independent reviewers selected studies, extracted data, and assessed the quality of the evidence. The Joanna-Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools and the Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions Statement were used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Effect estimates of some outcomes were synthesized using alternative methods and data for other outcomes synthesized narratively as a meta-analysis was not possible.

Results: Nine studies comprising 3 case-control, 3 cross-sectional, and 3 single-subject study designs, involving 433 participants that met the eligibility criteria, were included. Two studies reported slower resting RR among LTMs compared to controls [SMD = - 2.98, 95% CI (- 4.48 to - 1.47), overall-effect (z-score) = 3.88 (p < 0.001), I2 = 69%] with similar trend reported in the third study (MD = - 1.6, p = 0.053). Three studies reported slower RR in LTMs during meditation compared to baseline. Slower resting RR and mean RR change during meditation compared to baseline significantly negatively associated with meditation experience. PEFR was significantly higher in LTMs than controls [MD = 1.67, 95% CI (0.19-3.15), z-score = 2.21 (p = 0.03)]. No significant difference was observed in tidal volume [SDM = 0.93, 95% CI (- 1.13 to 2.99), z-score = 0.89 (p = 0.37), I2 = 96%] and vital capacity [SDM = 1.25, 95% CI (- 0.45 to 2.95), z-score = 1.44 (p = 0.15), I2 = 94%] of LTMs compared to controls.

Conclusions: Long-term meditation appears to be associated with slower baseline RR, and immediate reduction in RR during meditation, where greater practice amplifies the effects. Evidence on spirometry parameters in LTMs with ≥ 3 years of practice was limited.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Meditation Programs for Psychological Stress and Well-being Diverse adult clinical populations 2014 Meta-analysis n = 3,515
Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for Stress Management in Healthy People: A Review and Meta-Analysis Healthy subjects 2009 Systematic review and meta-analysis
The psychological effects of meditation: A meta-analysis. Nonclinical groups of adult meditators 2012 Meta-analysis n = 163
Efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in Prevention of Depressive Relapse Adults with recurrent depression in full or partial remission 2016 Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized controlled trials n = 1,258
Mindfulness‐Based Stress Reduction and Mindfulness‐Based Cognitive Therapy – a systematic review of randomized controlled trials 2011 Systematic review

Citations in the library

Explore topics