Skip to content

The relationship between mindfulness, psychological flexibility, and symptom severity in persons with schizophrenia-spectrum-disorders: a cross-sectional study.

Inge Hahne, Julia Segerer, Marco Zierhut, Niklas Bergmann, Thi Minh Tam Ta, Eric Hahn, Kerem Böge

Scientific Reports June 4, 2025 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-03380-2 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Cross-sectional study Longitudinal Peer reviewed
Sample size 94
Population Persons with schizophrenia spectrum disorders
Topics Meditation
Keywords Depressive symptoms Mediation Negative symptoms Psychological flexibility Schizophrenia spectrum disorders Symptom reduction
Citations 3
Key findings Psychological flexibility mediated the relationship between mindfulness and both negative and depressive symptoms in people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

Abstract

The effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) in enhancing mental well-being and reducing positive, negative, and depressive symptoms in schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) has been increasingly supported by evidence. However, the underlying mechanisms of MBIs require further examination. Psychological flexibility (PF), typically assessed through cognitive fusion, has been associated with clinical change in MBIs. This study employed a cross-sectional design to explore the interplay between mindfulness, PF, and symptom severity in SSD. A total of N = 94 persons with SSD were included in the analysis. Correlation and mediation analyses were performed using PROCESS analysis, with positive, negative, and depressive symptom severity as outcome variables, measured by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21), respectively. The findings indicated that mindfulness was significantly negatively correlated with positive and depressive symptoms and significantly positively correlated with PF. A significant mediating effect of PF was identified in the relationship between mindfulness and both negative and depressive symptoms. This study supports previous research suggesting PF as a possible mechanism of action in MBIs. However, future research utilizing longitudinal designs, more nuanced analyses, and mixed method approaches in assessment tools is warranted.

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Construct Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Meditating and Nonmeditating Samples Experienced meditators and nonmeditating comparison groups 2008 Cross-sectional study
Neural Correlates of Dispositional Mindfulness During Affect Labeling Adult participants 2007 Observational cross-sectional n = 27
Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: Development and validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). School-aged children and adolescents 2011 Cross-sectional validation study n = 1,413
Mindfulness and self-compassion as predictors of psychological wellbeing in long-term meditators and matched nonmeditators Experienced meditators and demographically matched nonmeditators 2012 Cross-sectional study n = 152
Mechanisms of Action in the Inverse Relationship Between Mindfulness and Psychological Distress Undergraduates 2008 Cross-sectional, correlational

Citations in the library

Explore topics