顏色關係論: 從本體論拆解光譜倒轉悖論的實體化謬誤
Boduen Wang
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) April 16, 2026 preprint DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19606942 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that the Inverted Spectrum Paradox is not a genuine logical paradox but results from a "Fallacy of Misplaced Concreteness"—mistaking a psychophysical mapping function for an independent entity. Proposes redefining color as a triadic relational event of object-mapping function-subject, and contends that the paradox's presuppositions of cross-subject mapping identity and qualia commensurability are self-contradictory and undefined. The author further claims the framework can deconstruct the Knowledge Argument (Mary's Room). |
Abstract
本文旨在透過嚴格的本體論與集合論形式化,論證心靈哲學中著名的「光譜倒轉悖論」(Inverted Spectrum Paradox)並非邏輯上的真實悖論。相反地,該悖論源於將「心理物理映射函數」錯誤實體化,進而產生了錯置具體性謬誤(Fallacy of Misplaced Concreteness)。本文主張將顏色重新界定為「客體-映射函數-主體」的三元關係性事件。在此基礎上,我們證明了傳統悖論所依賴的兩大核心預設——亦即跨主體現象映射的完全同一性,以及第一人稱現象質(Qualia)的可共量性——在邏輯架構與本體論拓樸上皆為自相矛盾且未定義的。為鞏固此一關係性框架,本文進一步引入拓樸學的自同構與函數單值性原則,徹底防禦了屬性二元論的詰問。一旦我們拒絕將關係性過程誤認為獨立實體,此種知識論層級的焦慮即告消解。最終,本模型亦被成功應用於解構另一經典難題:「知識論證」(瑪麗房間)悖論。