Skip to content

Main presumptions of phenomenology in psychological research

Artūras Deltuva

Psichologija 1996 DOI: 10.15388/psichol.1996.0.4461 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Philosophy of mind
Key points Argues that natural-science methods are insufficient for the human sciences and that consciousness should be used as a tool for obtaining knowledge rather than denied. Drawing on Husserl's "Renewal: Its Problem and Method," the author proposes phenomenological analysis as an active process of giving verbal expression to the stream of conscious experience, and considers how such ideas can be applied in psychological research practice.

Abstract

This article discusses the border of methods of the Natural sciences in the field of Human sciences as well as the need for a new method of conducting research of consciousness and using consciousness as a tool to get knowledge instead of denying it. These ideas are discussed in connection with the ideas of E. Husserl's article “Renewal: Its Problem and Method”. The main ideas of phenomenology in connection with psychological research are presented; “What ideas are possible to accept in the practice of psychological research?” and “How can one use it practically?” Phenomenological dates are discussed as the meaning of experience, and phenomenological analysis, as an active process with the goal of giving verbal expression to the stream of human conscious experience.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on philosophy of mind, most cited first.

Explore topics