Skip to content

Dybbuk and Maggid: Two Cultural Patterned of Altered Consciousness in Judaism

Yoram Bilu

AJS Review The Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies November 1, 1996 DOI: 10.1017/s0364009400008552 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Historical analysis Peer reviewed
Topics Altered states of consciousness
Citations 24
Key points Argues that scholars of Judaism avoided anthropological methods for several reasons: classical ethnography's focus on small-scale, non-literate societies seemed inapplicable to Judaism's text-based "great tradition"; early comparative work by Robertson Smith and Frazer appeared methodologically unsound; and an emotional reluctance to equate "primitive" religions with monotheism reinforced this caution.

Abstract

For many years scholars of Judaism were reluctant to employ the analytic tools distilled in anthropology for studying Jewish culture. One reason for this reluctance was that the classical ethnographic field, consisting of a small-scale tribal society with no written tradition, did not appear pertinent to the study of the text-informed “great tradition“ of Judaism. In addition, the notion of comparative research implicit in most anthropological studies appeared dubious to many scholars of Judaism, who were alarmed by the sweeping, methodologically unfounded comparisons evident in the treatment of biblical material by such precursors of modern anthropology as Robertson Smith and Frazer.1 This methodological consideration was augmented by an emotional unwillingness to equate the “primitive’ religious systems of “savage’ societies with concepts and rituals pertaining to the oldest monotheistic religion.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on altered states of consciousness, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics