Skip to content

Intranasal esketamine significantly alleviates depression severity and suicidal ideations in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) non-responders.

Erhan Kavakbasi, Kevin Rosemann, Mert Yilmaz, Helmut Berndt, Bernhard T Baune

European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience July 1, 2025 DOI: 10.1007/s00406-025-02041-9 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Retrospective study Peer reviewed
Sample size 96
Population Inpatients with treatment-resistant depression
Intervention Intranasal esketamine
Topics Depression Esketamine
Keywords Electroconvulsive therapy Novel antidepressants Treatment resistant depression
Citations 2
Key points History of ECT non-response does not significantly impact esketamine treatment outcomes in patients with treatment-resistant depression.

Abstract

Intranasal esketamine (ESK) is a novel therapy option in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Patients with a history of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) non-response (ECT+) in the current episode have usually been excluded from previous studies. Data on the effectiveness of ESK in ECT non-responders are sparse. In this retrospective study, we investigated the effectiveness of intranasal ESK in real-world inpatients with (ECT+, n = 39) history of ECT non-response compared to patients who have not received an adequate course of ECT in their current episode (ECT-, n = 57). A factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) has been used to determine the impact of ECT non-response on treatment outcome. A total of n = 96 patients (mean age 47.0; 52.1% women) with TRD were included in this study. There was a significant main effect of history of ECT non-response on MADRS score in the ANOVA (F = 10.386, p = 0.002). However, there was no significant interaction effect of time (pre-treatment, post-treatment)*history of ECT non-response in current episode (F = 2.166, p = 0.143). The response (34.9% vs. 21.9%, χ2 = 1.498, p = 0.167) and remission rates (24.4% vs. 12.1%, χ2 = 1.861, p = 0.141) were none significantly lower in the ECT + group than in the ECT- group. There was significant improvement in MADRS and BDI-II in the ECT + group. No major safety concerns occurred during the study. There was no significant impact of ECT non-response on esketamine treatment outcome. Our results support the approach to offer esketamine to ECT non-responders given that the array of treatment alternatives is limited for these patients.

Comparable studies

Other observational and cohort studies on esketamine for depression, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Treating bipolar depression with esketamine: Safety and effectiveness data from a naturalistic multicentric study on esketamine in bipolar versus unipolar treatment‐resistant depression Patients with treatment-resistant bipolar depression (B-TRD) and unipolar... 2023 Observational cohort n = 70
Comparative Effectiveness of Intravenous Ketamine and Intranasal Esketamine in Clinical Practice Among Patients With Treatment-Refractory Depression: An Observational Study. Adults with treatment-resistant depression 2023 Observational study n = 62
Predicting outcome with Intranasal Esketamine treatment: A machine-learning, three-month study in Treatment-Resistant Depression (ESK-LEARNING) Treatment-resistant depression patients 2023 Retrospective, multicentric, real-world study n = 149
Esketamine in treatment-resistant depression patients comorbid with substance-use disorder: A viewpoint on its safety and effectiveness in a subsample of patients from the REAL-ESK study Patients with treatment-resistant depression and a substance use disorder 2023 Observational, retrospective, multicentre study n = 26
Rapid infusion of esketamine for unipolar and bipolar depression: a retrospective chart review Patients with treatment-resistant depression and bipolar depression meeting DSM-IV-TR... 2017 Retrospective observational study n = 27

Citations in the library

Explore topics

By condition and practice