Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Combining Intranasal Esketamine and Electroconvulsive Therapy in Severe Treatment‑Resistant Depression: A Case Series.

Sergi López-rodríguez, Aida De Arriba-Arnau, José Manuel Menchón, Pino Alonso, Mikel Urretavizcaya

The Journal of ECT January 29, 2026 DOI: 10.1097/yct.0000000000001233 (opens in new tab) via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Combining electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) with intranasal esketamine (ESK) may offer sustained improvement for adults with severe treatment-resistant depression who had only partial benefit from either treatment alone. In four patients aged 50 to 72, the combination reduced depression scores by an average of 58% over 24 weeks, with no relapses. Two patients who added the complementary treatment to partial monotherapy showed symptom reductions of 50% and 37%. Two others who were already responding to maintenance ECT had further improvements of 62% and 83%, allowing ECT sessions to be spaced from weekly to every two to three weeks. Side effects were mild and temporary, including brief dissociation and post-ictal confusion. These findings suggest the combination is feasible and warrants controlled trials.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Case series Case report Peer reviewed
Sample size 4
Population Adults aged 50 to 72 with severe treatment-resistant depression
Interventions Electroconvulsive therapy Intranasal esketamine
Dose 28 to 84 mg
Duration 24 weeks
Topics Depression Esketamine
Keywords Case series Combination therapy Electroconvulsive therapy Maintenance treatment
Citations 1
Key finding Combined ECT and esketamine was associated with sustained symptom improvement and wider ECT spacing in four patients with treatment-resistant depression.

Abstract

This case series describes the combined use of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and intranasal esketamine (ESK)-2 rapidly acting, evidence-based options for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Each can leave residual symptoms or early relapse. Whether concurrent use confers more durable benefit remains unclear. We followed 4 adults (50 to 72 y) with severe TRD who had shown partial or waning benefit to ECT or ESK alone. During acute treatment, bilateral ECT (2 to 3 sessions/wk) was paired with ESK (28 to 84 mg, 1 to 2 doses/wk) on non-ECT days. Over 24 weeks, ECT was tapered individually to every 1 to 3 weeks while ESK continued weekly or fortnightly, with schedules adjusted to course and tolerability. MADRS, ECT cadence, and adverse events were documented every 4 weeks. Two response profiles emerged. In 2 patients, adding the complementary modality to partial monotherapy produced sustained improvement: ESK added to ongoing ECT reduced MADRS from 36→18 (-50%), and ECT during ongoing ESK reduced MADRS from 35→22 (-37%). In 2 maintenance-ECT responders, adding ESK produced improvements from 42→16 (-62%) and 36→6 (-83%), allowing ECT intervals to extend from weekly to every 14 to 21 days. Mean symptom reduction was 58%; no relapses occurred over 24 weeks. Adverse events were mild and transient-brief dissociation (3/4) and post-ictal confusion (2/4); no serious events occurred. In this naturalistic series, combined ECT+ESK was feasible and associated with sustained symptom improvement, wider ECT spacing, and potentially lower cognitive burden. Findings are hypothesis-generating, support prospective controlled trials to define sequencing, dosing, and safety.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment