Neurophysiological Evidence for the Detection of External Stimuli During Sleep
Kimberly A Cote, L Etienne, Kenneth B. Campbell
Sleep October 1, 2001 DOI: 10.1093/sleep/24.7.1 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Experimental study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 24 |
| Population | Young adults |
| Measures | P300 |
| Citations | 53 |
| Key findings | No P300 was identified during non-REM sleep. In REM sleep, very rare loud deviants elicited a parietal P300 that was attenuated relative to the waking ignore condition and lacked the frontal dispersion of the peak. The authors conclude participants are conscious (parietal P300) of very rare and intrusive stimuli during REM sleep, though frontal aspects associated with this consciousness may be absent. |
Abstract
STUDY
Objectives: A cognitive evoked potential, labelled "P300," is elicited when an observer attends to and detects an infrequently delivered "target" stimulus. It is not typically present if the target is ignored or undetected. P300 is therefore thought to reflect some aspect of consciousness of the stimulus. There has been much controversy concerning whether P300 can be recorded in sleep, a state in which information processing of external events is presumably reduced. The present study investigated the effects of both pitch and intensity stimuli on information processing, in order to determine whether a more salient stimulus might elicit a P300 in sleep that is comparable to the waking P300.
Design: A true P300 will have a parietal maximum peak following a rare stimulus, and its amplitude will vary inversely with the probability of stimulus delivery. Participants were thus randomly assigned to one of three probability groups, in which the deviant was presented on 20%, 10%, or 5% of trials.
Setting: Data were collected in the Human Neurophysiology Laboratory at the University of Ottawa.
Participants: Twenty-four young adults.
Interventions: N/A.
Measurements: AND
Results: During wakefulness, a parietal P300 was apparent following both pitch and intensity deviants when participants were asked to detect deviant stimuli. A P300 was also apparent following the intensity deviant when participants were instructed to ignore the stimuli. During non-REM sleep, no P300 could be identified. In REM sleep, very rare (p=.05) loud deviants elicited a parietal P300. This P300 was attenuated relative to the waking ignore condition. Moreover, the frontal dispersion of the peak was absent.
Conclusions: These data provide evidence that participants are conscious (parietal P300) of very rare and intrusive stimuli during REM sleep, although the frontal aspects associated with this consciousness may be absent.
Citations in the library
Cited by 6
- Balancing Prediction and Surprise: A Role for Active Sleep at the Dawn of Consciousness? Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 2021
- Evidence of P3a During Sleep, a Process Associated With Intrusions Into Consciousness in the Waking State. Frontiers in Neuroscience 2018
- Consciousness: here, there and everywhere? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences May 19, 2015
- Arousal modulates auditory attention and awareness: insights from sleep, sedation and disorders of consciousness Frontiers in Psychology May 22, 2014
- Probing awareness during sleep with the auditory odd-ball paradigm. International Journal of Psychophysiology December 2002
and 1 more in the library