Skip to content

Neurophysiological bases of exponential sensory decay and top-down memory retrieval: a model.

Ariel Zylberberg, Stanislas Dehaene, Gabriel B Mindlin, Mariano Sigman

Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience 2009 DOI: 10.3389/neuro.10.004.2009 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Attentional blink Attractor networks Dual-task interference Iconic memory Stochastic processes
Key points Proposes that a two-stage biophysical model, with a transient stimulus-driven response followed by an amplification-and-retrieval stage regulated by external currents, can account for the brief perceptual buffer and its top-down access. The model reproduces the dependence of performance on response times in interference experiments, suggesting that sensory buffering does not require a specific dedicated mechanism.

Abstract

Behavioral observations suggest that multiple sensory elements can be maintained for a short time, forming a perceptual buffer which fades after a few hundred milliseconds. Only a subset of this perceptual buffer can be accessed under top-down control and broadcasted to working memory and consciousness. In turn, single-cell studies in awake-behaving monkeys have identified two distinct waves of response to a sensory stimulus: a first transient response largely determined by stimulus properties and a second wave dependent on behavioral relevance, context and learning. Here we propose a simple biophysical scheme which bridges these observations and establishes concrete predictions for neurophsyiological experiments in which the temporal interval between stimulus presentation and top-down allocation is controlled experimentally. Inspired in single-cell observations, the model involves a first transient response and a second stage of amplification and retrieval, which are implemented biophysically by distinct operational modes of the same circuit, regulated by external currents. We explicitly investigated the neuronal dynamics, the memory trace of a presented stimulus and the probability of correct retrieval, when these two stages were bracketed by a temporal gap. The model predicts correctly the dependence of performance with response times in interference experiments suggesting that sensory buffering does not require a specific dedicated mechanism and establishing a direct link between biophysical manipulations and behavioral observations leading to concrete predictions.

Citations in the library

Explore topics