Actos básicos y actos fundados. Exposición crítica de los primeros análisis husserlianos
Agustín Serrano de Haro
Anuario Filosófico October 4, 2018 DOI: 10.15581/009.28.29828 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Citations | 3 |
| Key points | Argues that Husserl's account of the dependence of all conscious acts on representations changed between Logical Investigations and Ideas, and contends that both formulations remain problematic. |
Abstract
Phenomenology is supposed to provide an intrinsic account of the possible types of conscious acts and of their relationship to each other. Husselr's enduring frame on this subject rests on the distinction between "objectifying acts" –representations– and "non-objectifying acts" –emotions and volitions–. But the sense of the dependence of every act on representations, suffered a deep change from Logical Investigations –the intentional reference of non-objectifying acts proceeds completely from cognitive reference– to Ideas –the peculiar emotional reference to values needs preferably a doxic-objectifying modality–. Both theories remain, in the end, problematic.