Projecting the real through active inference: a unified model of reality construction from neuronal dynamics to social consensus a neuroscientific framework for psychopathology
Frontiers in Psychiatry October 14, 2026 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1815025 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that the brain actively projects reality through predictive processing, analogous to quantum decoherence, and that this projection changes what is projected: strong projections reduce uncertainty, weak ones amplify prediction errors, and distorted ones yield alternative realities resistant to correction. Proposes that individual projections are stabilized into shared reality through social interaction, language, and culture, a process termed "collective active inference," and that psychiatric disorders are fundamentally disorders of this projection capacity. |
Abstract
How does the brain transform a chaotic stream of sensory signals into a stable, shared experience of reality? This theoretical paper proposes that the brain does not passively receive the world, but actively projects it – it continuously generates predictions about sensory inputs and updates its internal model when predictions fail, a process formally described by the free energy principle and active inference. We argue that this process can be understood through an analogy with quantum decoherence – the collapse of multiple possibilities into a single actuality. By integrating insights from this analogy with active inference, we show how the brain resolves sensory uncertainty into a coherent projection of reality. A central question we address is whether projecting reality changes it. We argue that it does: a strong, coherent projection reduces uncertainty, while a weak or fragmented one amplifies prediction errors, and a distorted one – diverging from social consensus – leads to alternative realities that resist correction. This projection operates in discrete, rhythmic cycles governed by brain waves and is fine-tuned by neurochemicals that determine how much we “trust” our predictions versus new sensory data. The Default Mode Network – the brain’s inner “sea” of self-awareness, memories, and context – acts as a central hub that integrates and updates these projections. Crucially, individual projections are stabilized into a shared, “solid” reality through social interaction, language, and culture – a process we call collective active inference. Within this framework, psychiatric disorders are understood as disorders of projection – distortions in how the brain generates and stabilizes its model of reality. This perspective reverses the traditional explanatory gradient: psychopathology is not merely a sensory or chemical problem, but a fundamental disruption of the brain’s capacity to project a coherent world. This unifying framework offers a new foundation for both pharmacological and psychotherapeutic interventions, grounding them in a common computational logic.
Citations in the library
Cites 12
- The Brain's Default Mode Network Annual Review of Neuroscience May 4, 2015
- Psychosis as a state of aberrant salience: a framework linking biology, phenomenology, and pharmacology in schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry 2003
- The Predictive Coding Account of Psychosis. Biological Psychiatry May 25, 2018
- The default-mode, ego-functions and free-energy: a neurobiological account of Freudian ideas Brain February 28, 2010
- Ketamine: a paradigm shift for depression research and treatment Neuron March 1, 2019
and 7 more in the library