Skip to content

Composite Subjectivity in Organisms, Organs, and Organizations

L. Roelofs

Combining Minds February 20, 2019 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190859053.003.0006 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key points Examines four candidate cases of mental combination—the "Nation-Brain" thought experiment, actual human social groups, split-brain patients, and the ordinary two-hemisphere brain—to test what the theory developed in the previous chapter implies about collective and unified mentality. Argues that the differences between real social groups and the thought experiment matter for questions of collective mentality, and contrasts the divided consciousness seen in split-brain cases with the unified consciousness the intact corpus callosum supports.

Abstract

This chapter looks at four potential cases of mental combination, to examine what the theory sketched in the previous chapter might say about them. It starts with the “Nation-Brain” thought experiment, originally offered as a reductio ad absurdum of functionalism, where a few billion people agree to collectively simulate a single human mind. It then considers actual human social groups, the ways that they differ from this thought experiment, and the significance of these differences for questions of collective mentality. It next considers the split-brain phenomenon, where patients with a severed corpus callosum seem at times to exhibit two distinct consciousnesses in one head, and then finally comes back to the ordinary human brain, where two cerebral hemispheres, each capable of supporting consciousness without the other, are able to establish richly unified consciousness through their intact corpus callosum.

Citations in the library

Explore topics