Skip to content

The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Error Rates in the Distractor-Induced Deafness Paradigm

Lars Michael, Ana Böke, Henry Ipczynski

Brain Sciences June 4, 2022 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12060738 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Experimental study Peer reviewed
Citations 1
Key findings The auditory distractor-induced blindness paradigm replicated the expected deafness effect, with target detection falling as the number of distractors increased. Frontal tDCS had no significant effect on target detection per se, but error rates due to missed cues were higher under stimulation. The authors suggest the task may have been too easy to respond to stimulation, and that the error-rate effect may reflect divided attention between the visual cue and the auditory target.

Abstract

To further understand how consciousness emerges, certain paradigms inducing distractor-induced perceptual impairments are promising. Neuro-computational models explain the inhibition of conscious perception of targets with suppression of distractor information when the target and distractor share the same features. Because these gating mechanisms are controlled by the prefrontal cortex, transcranial direct current stimulation of this specific region is expected to alter distractor-induced effects depending on the presence and number of distractors. To this end, participants were asked to perform an auditory variant of the distractor-induced blindness paradigm under frontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Results show the expected distractor-induced deafness effects in a reduction of target detection depending on the number of distractors. While tDCS had no significant effects on target detection per se, error rates due to missed cues are increased under stimulation. Thus, while our variant led to successful replication of behavioral deafness effects, the results under tDCS stimulation indicate that the chosen paradigm may have difficulty too low to respond to stimulation. That the error rates nevertheless led to a tDCS effect may be due to the divided attention between the visual cue and the auditory target.

Citations in the library

Explore topics