Skip to content

Measuring Mindfulness in Black Americans: A Psychometric Validation of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire

Gold N. Okafor, B. Ford, Stephen Antonoplis, Anita M. Reina, Samina Lutfeali, Amanda J Shallcross

Mindfulness February 10, 2023 DOI: 10.1007/s12671-023-02072-0 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Longitudinal validation study Preregistered Peer reviewed
Sample size 586
Population Non-clinical Black American adults in the United States
Duration Two time points one month apart
Measures Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ-39), Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire short form (FFMQ-15)
Topics Meditation
Key findings Both the 39-item and 15-item FFMQ showed a five-factor structure with good fit indices (RMSEA < 0.06, SRMR < 0.08, CFI > 0.92, TLI > 0.92), strong test–retest reliability over one month, expected associations with related constructs, and measurement invariance across ethnic heritage, ethnic identity, discrimination, skin tone, depression level, gender, meditation experience, and household income. The authors conclude that both versions can validly and reliably measure mindfulness in a non-clinical Black American sample.

Abstract

Objectives: Black Americans disproportionately experience higher levels of chronic stress. Mindfulness is a promising, cost-effective option for reducing stress and related mental health outcomes, such as depression and anxiety. The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) is one of the most widely used tools to measure mindfulness; however, Black American samples have been underrepresented in validation studies of the FFMQ. Consequently, the validity of the FFMQ within Black Americans has received minimal attention. The present study assessed the psychometric properties and nomological network of the original 39-item FFMQ (FFMQ-39) and the short form 15-item FFMQ (FFMQ-15) among a non-clinical, Black American sample in the United States.

Method: In a longitudinal study, 586 Black Americans completed either the FFMQ-39 or the FFMQ-15 at two time points one month apart, as well as measures of the constructs in mindfulness’ nomological network and demographic attributes.

Results: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a 5-factor structure in both questionnaires. Both questionnaires had good fit indices ( RMSEA < 0.06, SRMR < 0.08, CFI > 0.92, TFI > 0.92) and demonstrated strong test–retest reliability, expected associations with nomological network variables, and invariance across ethnic heritage, ethnic identity, everyday discrimination, lifetime discrimination, skin tone, depression level, gender, mindfulness meditation experience, and household income.

Conclusions: The results indicate that both the FFMQ-39 and the FFMQ-15 can validly and reliably measure mindfulness in a non-clinical, Black American sample. These findings contribute to cultural generalizability and mindfulness assessment within underrepresented populations. Preregistration The analytic plan was pre-registered on the Open Science Framework.

Registration: https://osf.io/95v4m

Comparable studies

Other observational and cohort studies on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Using Self-Report Assessment Methods to Explore Facets of Mindfulness Undergraduate students 2006 Observational cohort
Effectiveness of a meditation-based stress reduction program in the treatment of anxiety disorders Patients with generalized anxiety disorder or panic disorder with or without agoraphobia 1992 Observational cohort n = 22
Meditation experience is associated with increased cortical thickness Participants with extensive Insight meditation experience and matched controls 2005 Observational cohort n = 20
Meditation experience is associated with differences in default mode network activity and connectivity Experienced meditators and matched meditation-naive controls 2011 Observational cohort
Long-term meditators self-induce high-amplitude gamma synchrony during mental practice Long-term Buddhist practitioners and controls 2004 Observational cohort

Citations in the library

Explore topics