Skip to content

Transpersonal psychology: theoretical and methodological foundations, phenomenology of consciousness, and contemporary perspectives

Христина Михайлівна Хвойницька-Перейма

Academic Visions September 30, 2026 DOI: 10.66556/2786-586x.59.khvoinytskapereima-k (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Philosophy of mind
Key points Argues that transpersonal psychology is not a homogeneous school but comprises divergent models of consciousness, personality, and spiritual experience, and analyzes the tension between perennialist models and H. Ferrer's participatory approach. Contends that the field's most promising direction is investigating self-transformation and the structure of conscious experience while distinguishing empirically studied phenomena from metaphysical interpretations and integrating phenomenological sensitivity, empirical testability, interdisciplinarity, and methodological pluralism.

Abstract

The article provides a comprehensive philosophical and psychological analysis of transpersonal psychology as an approach to the study of human consciousness, boundary forms of human experience, and the possibilities of personal transformation. The historical prerequisites for the emergence of transpersonal psychology are examined in the context of humanistic psychology, research on altered states of consciousness, the psychology of religion, and phenomenology. The conceptual approaches of A. Maslow, S. Grof, K. Wilber, R. Walsh, F. Vaughan, and representatives of contemporary transpersonal theory are considered. Particular attention is paid to the concepts of peak experiences, self-transcendence, transpersonal experience, altered states of consciousness, and spiritual transformation. It is substantiated that transpersonal psychology is not a homogeneous theoretical school: different models of understanding the nature of consciousness, personality, and spiritual experience have emerged in the course of its development. The tension between perennialist models, which assume the existence of a universal foundation underlying different spiritual traditions, and the participatory approach proposed by H. Ferrer is analyzed. According to the latter, spiritual reality should not be reduced to a single transhistorical experience. The problem of the scientific status of transpersonal psychology and the need to distinguish empirically studied phenomena from metaphysical interpretations are also examined. It is demonstrated that the contemporary development of transpersonal psychology requires the integration of phenomenological sensitivity, empirical testability, interdisciplinarity, and methodological pluralism. It is concluded that the most promising direction is the investigation of the transformation of the self and the structure of conscious experience without prematurely identifying psychological phenomena with a particular metaphysical conception of reality.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on philosophy of mind, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics