Skip to content

Building the bridge-back: Dissociation as resource and resilience pathway in psychedelic-assisted therapy

Shannon Dames

Journal of Psychedelic Studies October 5, 2026 DOI: 10.1556/2054.2026.00552 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Psychedelic-assisted therapy
Key points Argues that dissociation in psychedelic-assisted therapy can be reinterpreted as protective distance within a resilience framework, and proposes the "bridge-back model" with three processes—protection, return, and integration—centered on congruence and sense of coherence. The authors contend that preparation and set and setting conditions supporting predictability and agency are especially important for supporting return and integration.

Abstract

Abstract: Background and

Aims: In Western clinical contexts, dissociation is a common transdiagnostic response to overwhelm and is highly relevant to integration capacity. In psychedelic-assisted therapy (PaT), non-ordinary states may open access to emotionally intense material while also activating protective distance when the experience outpaces coping capacity. This article introduces a clinical compass to support discernment and training and to strengthen conditions for return and integration in PaT.

Methods: This theory-informed conceptual synthesis advances a resilience-based reinterpretation of dissociation in PaT, integrating dissociation theory with resilience-as-resourcing pathways. This reinterpretation is expressed through the bridge-back model and operationalised as a practical compass for pacing and training.

Results: The bridge-back model conceptualises dissociation as protective distance and delineates three interrelated processes: protection, return, and integration. Two resilience capacities are central to returning from non-ordinary states: congruence (authentic self-contact in relationship) and sense of coherence (comprehensibility, manageability, and meaning). Set and setting influence the conditions that support—or strain—these capacities across preparation, dosing, and ongoing integration.

Conclusions: Reframing dissociation as a resilience-based process shifts clinical focus from “what's wrong?” to “where's the opportunity?” to inform leverage points for return. Preparation—and conditions that support predictability and agency—are especially important. By strengthening return capacities, practitioners can support integration and resilience pathways toward sustainable transformation.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on psychedelic-assisted therapy, most cited first.

Explore topics