Skip to content

'Introspectionism' and the mythical origins of scientific psychology.

Alan Costall

Consciousness and Cognition December 2006 DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2006.09.008 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key points Argues that the familiar three-stage history of scientific psychology—introspectionism, behaviourism, and the cognitive revolution—is largely mythical, because introspectionism was never dominant and introspection never went away. Contends that this narrative obscures conceptual problems, particularly surrounding the modern conception of "behaviour," that keep the scientific study of consciousness seeming weird.

Abstract

According to the majority of the textbooks, the history of modern, scientific psychology can be tidily encapsulated in the following three stages. Scientific psychology began with a commitment to the study of mind, but based on the method of introspection. Watson rejected introspectionism as both unreliable and effete, and redefined psychology, instead, as the science of behaviour. The cognitive revolution, in turn, replaced the mind as the subject of study, and rejected both behaviourism and a reliance on introspection. This paper argues that all three stages of this history are largely mythical. Introspectionism was never a dominant movement within modern psychology, and the method of introspection never went away. Furthermore, this version of psychology's history obscures some deep conceptual problems, not least surrounding the modern conception of "behaviour," that continues to make the scientific study of consciousness seem so weird.

Citations in the library

Explore topics