Skip to content

Conceptual, Theoretical, and Methodological Issues in Inferring Subjective Emotion Experience Recommendations for Researchers

Lis Nielsen, Alfred W. Kaszniak

Handbook of Emotion Elicitation and Assessment April 19, 2007 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780195169157.003.0023 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key points Argues that advancing the scientific study of consciousness requires systematic inclusion of phenomenological data and improved self-report methods, since current measures of phenomenal experience remain crude. Cites Varela's concern that reticence among traditional investigators to seriously investigate phenomenological data, including their own conscious states, may hinder the field.

Abstract

Abstract: In recent years, researchers in a variety of disciplines have outlined broad methodological strategies for approaching the scientific study of conscious experience, advocating the systematic inclusion of phenomenological data in ongoing research and the use of findings at the phenomenal level to constrain investigations at other, more objective levels of analysis (Baars, 1988; Chalmers, 1999, 2004; Flanagan, 1992; Varela, 1996). The proposals differ in the details, but they share the common theme that new and better self-report methods will be required to advance our understanding of experience. Compared with the apparent fine-grained nature of phenomenal experience, our measures of it remain crude. Varela (1996) lamented that the advancement of the field of consciousness studies may be hindered by a reticence on the part of traditional investigators to take phenomenological investigation seriously, especially when it comes to an investigation of their own conscious states.

Citations in the library

Explore topics