What in the world is consciousness?
Progress in Brain Research 2005 DOI: 10.1016/s0079-6123(05)50001-3 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that consciousness is best understood through a series of contrasts: states versus awareness, consciousness versus self-consciousness, narrow versus broad senses, inner versus outer conceptions, and easy versus hard questions. The paper contends that the validity of the easy/hard distinction is a focus of current debate and that diverse disciplines converge on consciousness study, creating scope for both interdisciplinary misunderstanding and fruitful dialog. |
Abstract
The concept of consciousness is multifaceted, and steeped in cultural and intellectual history. This paper explores its complexities by way of a series of contrasts: (i) states of consciousness, such as wakefulness and sleep, are contrasted with awareness, a term that picks out the contents of consciousness, which range across all our psychological capacities; (ii) consciousness is contrasted to self-consciousness, which is itself a complex term embracing self-detection, self-monitoring, self-recognition theory of mind and self-knowledge; (iii) "narrow" and "broad" senses of consciousness are contrasted, the former requiring mature human awareness capable of guiding action and self-report, the latter involving the much broader capacity to acquire and exploit knowledge; (iv) an "inner" conception of consciousness, by which awareness is essentially private and beyond the reach of scientific scrutiny, is contrasted with an "outer" conception which allows that consciousness is intrinsically linked with capacities for intelligent behavior; and finally (v) "easy" and "hard" questions of consciousness are distinguished, the former involving the underlying neurobiology of wakefulness and awareness, and the latter the allegedly more mysterious process by which biological processes generate experience - the question of whether this final distinction is valid is a focus of current debate. Varied interests converge on the study of consciousness, from the sciences and the humanities, creating scope for interdisciplinary misunderstandings, but also for a fruitful dialog.
Citations in the library
Cited by 17
- Dualism Persists in the Science of Mind Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences March 1, 2009
- Fantasy Proneness Correlates With the Intensity of Near-Death Experience Frontiers in Psychiatry June 7, 2018
- THE STRENGTH OF WEAK ARTIFICIAL CONSCIOUSNESS International Journal of Machine Consciousness May 19, 2009
- A neuroscientific model of near-death experiences. Nature Reviews Neurology June 1, 2025
- Is the "Minimally Conscious State" Patient Minimally Self-Aware? Frontiers in Psychology 2020
and 12 more in the library
Cites 4
- Theories of visual awareness. Progress in Brain Research 2004
- The comparative psychology of uncertainty monitoring and metacognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences June 2003
- The conscious access hypothesis: origins and recent evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2002
- Consciousness. Brain July 1, 2001