On the Role of Attention in Binocular Rivalry: Electrophysiological Evidence
Urte Roeber, Sandra Veser, Erich Schröger, Robert P. O’Shea
PLoS One July 22, 2011 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022612 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Event-related potential (ERP) experiment Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Human participants |
| Citations | 19 |
| Key findings | Attending to rival gratings yielded a smaller N1 ERP component (160-210 ms) than attending to a fixation target, which the authors describe as paradoxical. They propose rivalry occurred in the attend-to-fixation condition, indexed by a sustained negativity from 210-300 ms, and that the stimulus-change mechanism was more adapted when attending to the gratings, consistent with adaptation-based accounts of binocular rivalry. |
Abstract
During binocular rivalry visual consciousness fluctuates between two dissimilar monocular images. We investigated the role of attention in this phenomenon by comparing event-related potentials (ERPs) when binocular-rivalry stimuli were attended with when they were unattended. Stimuli were dichoptic, orthogonal gratings that yielded binocular rivalry and dioptic, identically oriented gratings that yielded binocular fusion. Events were all possible orthogonal changes in orientation of one or both gratings. We had two attention conditions: In the attend-to-grating condition, participants had to report changes in perceived orientation, focussing their attention on the gratings. In the attend-to-fixation condition participants had to report changes in a central fixation target, taking attention away from the gratings. We found, surprisingly, that attending to rival gratings yielded a smaller ERP component (the N1, from 160-210 ms) than attending to the fixation target. To explain this paradoxical effect of attention, we propose that rivalry occurs in the attend-to-fixation condition (we found an ERP signature of rivalry in the form of a sustained negativity from 210-300 ms) but that the mechanism processing the stimulus changes is more adapted in the attend-to-grating condition than in the attend-to-fixation condition. This is consistent with the theory that adaptation gives rise to changes of visual consciousness during binocular rivalry.
Citations in the library
Cited by 5
- Attention as a Process of Selection, Perception as a Process of Representation, and Phenomenal Experience as the Resulting Process of Perception Being Modulated by a Dedicated Consciousness Mechanism Frontiers in Psychology 2011
- Do early neural correlates of visual consciousness show the oblique effect? A binocular rivalry and event-related potential study. PLoS One December 12, 2017
- Brain activity from stimuli that are not perceived: Visual mismatch negativity during binocular rivalry suppression. Psychophysiology May 2017
- Distinct MEG correlates of conscious experience, perceptual reversals and stabilization during binocular rivalry. Neuroimage October 15, 2014
- A neural network approach to fMRI binocular visual rivalry task analysis. PLoS One 2014