Skip to content

Brain activity from stimuli that are not perceived: Visual mismatch negativity during binocular rivalry suppression.

Bradley N Jack, Andreas Widmann, Robert P O'Shea, Erich Schröger, Urte Roeber

Psychophysiology May 2017 DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12831 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Experimental ERP study Peer reviewed
Measures vMMN (visual mismatch negativity)
Keywords Binocular rivalry Erps Prediction error Visual consciousness
Key findings Both consciously perceived and suppressed monocular luminance-decrement deviants elicited a vMMN at about 250 ms after stimulus onset, with perceived deviants eliciting a larger vMMN than not-perceived deviants. The authors conclude that vMMN occurs in the absence of consciousness and that consciousness enhances the processing underlying vMMN, indicating that generative models of visual perception are tested even when sensory input is not perceived.

Abstract

Predictive coding explains visual perception as the result of an interaction between bottom-up sensory input and top-down generative models at each level of the visual hierarchy. Evidence for this comes from the visual mismatch negativity (vMMN): a more negative ERP for rare, unpredictable visual stimuli-deviants, than for frequent, predictable visual stimuli-standards. Here, we show that the vMMN does not require conscious experience. We measured the vMMN from monocular luminance-decrement deviants that were either perceived or not during binocular rivalry dominance or suppression, respectively. We found that both sorts of deviants elicited the vMMN at about 250 ms after stimulus onset, with perceived deviants eliciting a bigger vMMN than not-perceived deviants. These results show that vMMN occurs in the absence of consciousness, and that consciousness enhances the processing underlying vMMN. We conclude that generative models of visual perception are tested, even when sensory input for those models is not perceived.

Citations in the library