Skip to content

Rewarding effects of the optical isomers of 3,4-methylenedioxy-methylamphetamine ('Ecstasy') and 3,4-methylenedioxy-ethylamphetamine ('Eve') measured by conditioned place preference in rats.

Anja Meyer, Andreas Mayerhofer, Karl‐artur Kovar, Werner J Schmidt

Neuroscience Letters September 27, 2002 DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(02)00821-2 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Preclinical behavioral study Peer reviewed
Population Animals (species not stated)
Interventions MDMA MDE amphetamine
Measures conditioned place preference (CPP)
Topics MDMA
Key points MDMA produced no significant conditioned place preference overall, unlike amphetamine, but isolated animals showed significant CPP to MDMA while group-housed animals did not. Both optical isomers of MDMA and racemic MDMA produced significant CPP with no notable differences, whereas MDE and its isomers produced none. The authors argue that MDMA's addiction mechanism is more complicated than assumed and that at least two pathways may underlie MDMA-induced craving.

Abstract

3,4-methylenedioxy-methylamphetamine (MDMA) ('Ecstasy') and its analogue 3,4-methylenedioxy-methylamphetamine (MDE) ('Eve') are well known illicit street drugs mainly abused by young people. In spite of the actual research going on, the classification of their abuse potential remains unclear. Since secondary reinforcers are the main factors responsible for craving and relapse, the aim of our study was to assess the potency of MDMA and MDE in a second order reinforcement paradigm, i.e. conditioned place preference (CPP). For the general assessment of our study conditions, we compared MDMA with amphetamine. Unexpectedly, no significant CPP for MDMA was found in contrast to amphetamine. Detailed analysis of current literature led us to the working hypothesis that social environment is crucial for the development of CPP. In a subsequent experiment we tested the influence of housing conditions on CPP using MDMA and demonstrated that isolated animals show significant CPP compared to group-housed ones. In order to better understand the rewarding mechanisms of Ecstasy-derivatives, we tested both the racemic drugs and the pure isomers in the CPP paradigm. Both MDMA's optical isomers and racemic MDMA showed significant CPP without notable differences, while MDE and its isomers completely failed to show any significant CPP. In conclusion, the mechanism by which MDMA induces addiction is much more complicated than assumed so far and more pronounced in isolated animals. The fact that both optical isomers of MDMA led to CPP implies that at least two pathways by which MDMA induces craving behaviour exist.

Comparable studies

Other preclinical and animal studies on MDMA, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Cited by 17

and 12 more in the library

Cites 8

and 3 more in the library

Explore topics