The role of “prespecification” in an embodied cognition
J. Scott Jordan
Behavioral and Brain Sciences June 1, 2004 DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x04330098 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Commentary Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that Grush's sophisticated embellishment of von Holst and Mittelstaedt's (1950) efference copy hypothesis still suffers from the same conceptual limitations entailed in the model's original formulation. |
Abstract
Grush makes extensive use of von Holst and Mittelstaedt's (1950) efference copy hypothesis. Although his embellishment of the model is admirably more sophisticated than that of its progenitors, I argue that it still suffers from the same conceptual limitations as entailed in its original formulation.