Skip to content

Culture, embodiment and genes: unravelling the triple helix.

Michael A. Wheeler, Andy Clark

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences November 12, 2008 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0135 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key points Argues that the apparent mismatch between evolutionary psychology and work on embodiment and cultural evolution can be resolved by recognizing the power and scope of cognitive niche construction and by adopting more nuanced views of cognitive modularity and an evolved universal human nature, yielding a richer account of the combined interactive potency of biological and cultural evolution for active, embodied agents.

Abstract

Much recent work stresses the role of embodiment and action in thought and reason, and celebrates the power of transmitted cultural and environmental structures to transform the problem-solving activity required of individual brains. By apparent contrast, much work in evolutionary psychology has stressed the selective fit of the biological brain to an ancestral environment of evolutionary adaptedness, with an attendant stress upon the limitations and cognitive biases that result. On the face of it, this suggests either a tension or, at least, a mismatch, with the symbiotic dyad of cultural evolution and embodied cognition. In what follows, we explore this mismatch by focusing on three key ideas: cognitive niche construction; cognitive modularity; and the existence (or otherwise) of an evolved universal human nature. An appreciation of the power and scope of the first, combined with consequently more nuanced visions of the latter two, allow us to begin to glimpse a much richer vision of the combined interactive potency of biological and cultural evolution for active, embodied agents.

Citations in the library