Skip to content

Young Foucault's phenomenology: “A science of madmen and of genius”

E. Basso

The Southern Journal of Philosophy June 16, 2026 DOI: 10.1111/sjp.70050 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Philosophy of mind
Key points Argues that young Foucault's interest in phenomenology was not orthodox adherence to a single program but involved varied appropriations of German phenomenology in France, and claims theoretical affinities between Binswanger's phenomenological anthropology, Canguilhem's biological thinking, and Bachelard's perspective on imagination.

Abstract

The article shows that young Foucault's interest in phenomenology should not be understood as a more or less orthodox adherence to a singular philosophical program. Emphasis is given to the variety of contexts, meanings, and uses (or appropriations) of German phenomenology in France at the time when Foucault was interested in it at the beginning of his intellectual career. In particular, the article proves the theoretical affinities between, respectively, the phenomenological anthropology of Ludwig Binswanger, the biological thinking of Georges Canguilhem, and Gaston Bachelard's perspective on the issue of imagination. It is argued that the methodological approach used here allows us to account for the transformations, and sometimes contradictions, that characterize the intellectual trajectory of a philosopher, as Foucault defines himself in the first edition of Folie et déraison , who “turned to psychology, and from psychology to history.”

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on philosophy of mind, most cited first.

Explore topics