Spiritual Hysteria: A Gendered Perspective
Vijaya Ramaswamy
Anthem Press eBooks March 5, 2012 DOI: 10.7135/upo9781843317760.017 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Commentary Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Citations | 1 |
| Key points | The text argues that psychoanalysis and Western mechanistic science have routinely pathologized mystical and spiritual experiences, labeling shamans, saints, prophets, and religious teachers with psychiatric diagnoses, and it presents Grof's Beyond the Brain as challenging these rigid divides through the concept of 'spiritual emergence'. |
Abstract
Trances, visions, speaking in many tongues, irrational social behaviour including the discarding of clothes have been widely interpreted by psychoanalysts as a psychopathological condition. However, parapsychologists are increasingly looking at the grey zone that blurs the rigidly held distinctions between psychoses and spirituality. Stanislav Grof, in his remarkable book Beyond the Brain: Birth, Death and Transcendence in Psychotherapy , published in 1985, goes beyond these neat divides between psychiatry and spirituality to take a fresh look at the phenomenon of ‘spiritual emergence’. To quote Grof: In principle, Western mechanic science tends to see spiri- tual experiences of any kind as pathological phenomena. Mainstream psychoanalysis, following Freud's example, interprets the unifying and oceanic states of mystics as re-gression to primary narcissism and infantile helplessness and sees religion as a collective obsessive-compulsive neu-rosis […] The great shamans of various aboriginal tradi-tions have been described as schizophrenic or epileptic, and various psychiatric labels have been put on all major saints, prophets, and religious teachers. While many sci-entific studies describe the similarities between mysticism and mental disease, there is very little genuine apprecia-tion of mysticism or awareness of the differences between the mystical world view and psychosis […] These psychi-atric criteria are applied routinely and without distinc-tion even to such great religious teachers of the scope of Buddha, Jesus, Mohammad, Sri Ramana Maharishi or Ramakrishna. (p.334)