Skip to content

Learning rapidly about the relevance of visual cues requires conscious awareness.

Eoin Travers, Chris Frith, Nicholas Shea

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology August 2018 DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1373834 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Experimental study Peer reviewed
Keywords Consciousness Attention Learning Masked priming
Key findings Both conscious and unconscious cues influenced manual and saccadic response speeds, indicating unconscious visual processing. But participants only adapted to reversed cue-target contingencies (Experiment 1) or changes in cue reliability (Experiment 2) when they were consciously aware of the cues. The authors argue that learning about cues over a few trials requires conscious awareness.

Abstract

Humans have been shown to be capable of performing many cognitive tasks using information of which they are not consciously aware. This raises questions about what role consciousness actually plays in cognition. Here, we explored whether participants can learn cue-target contingencies in an attentional learning task when the cues were presented below the level of conscious awareness and how this differs from learning about conscious cues. Participants' manual (Experiment 1) and saccadic (Experiment 2) response speeds were influenced by both conscious and unconscious cues. However, participants were only able to adapt to reversals of the cue-target contingencies (Experiment 1) or changes in the reliability of the cues (Experiment 2) when consciously aware of the cues. Therefore, although visual cues can be processed unconsciously, learning about cues over a few trials requires conscious awareness of them. Finally, we discuss implications for cognitive theories of consciousness.

Citations in the library