Skip to content

New directions in hypnosis research: strategies for advancing the cognitive and clinical neuroscience of hypnosis.

Mark P Jensen, Graham Jamieson, Antoine Lutz, Giuliana Mazzoni, William J McGeown, Enrica L Santarcangelo, Athena Demertzi, Vilfredo De Pascalis, Éva Bányai, Christian Rominger, Patrik Vuilleumier, Marie-Elisabeth Faymonville, Devin B. Terhune

Neuroscience of Consciousness April 12, 2017 DOI: 10.1093/nc/nix004 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Review Peer reviewed
Keywords Consciousness Hypnosis Hypnotizability Hypnotic suggestibility
Key findings The authors report that clinical research supports hypnosis for managing various symptoms and conditions, that divisions of the anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortices are implicated in hypnotic responding, and that high hypnotic suggestibility is associated with atypical brain connectivity. They argue the field should move past state-versus-nonstate debates toward studying treatment efficacy and neurophysiological mechanisms, and recommend better assessment of hypnotic suggestibility, inclusion of mid-range responders, and designs separating inductions from specific suggestions.

Abstract

This article summarizes key advances in hypnosis research during the past two decades, including (i) clinical research supporting the efficacy of hypnosis for managing a number of clinical symptoms and conditions, (ii) research supporting the role of various divisions in the anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortices in hypnotic responding, and (iii) an emerging finding that high hypnotic suggestibility is associated with atypical brain connectivity profiles. Key recommendations for a research agenda for the next decade include the recommendations that (i) laboratory hypnosis researchers should strongly consider how they assess hypnotic suggestibility in their studies, (ii) inclusion of study participants who score in the middle range of hypnotic suggestibility, and (iii) use of expanding research designs that more clearly delineate the roles of inductions and specific suggestions. Finally, we make two specific suggestions for helping to move the field forward including (i) the use of data sharing and (ii) redirecting resources away from contrasting state and nonstate positions toward studying (a) the efficacy of hypnotic treatments for clinical conditions influenced by central nervous system processes and (b) the neurophysiological underpinnings of hypnotic phenomena. As we learn more about the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying hypnosis and suggestion, we will strengthen our knowledge of both basic brain functions and a host of different psychological functions.

Citations in the library

Cited by 29

and 24 more in the library

Cites 21

and 16 more in the library