Skip to content

Cross-cultural differences in somatic awareness and interoceptive accuracy: a review of the literature and directions for future research.

Christine Ma‐Kellams

Frontiers in Psychology December 3, 2014 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01379 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Review Peer reviewed
Topics Meditation
Keywords Culture Somatization Interoception Somatic awareness
Key findings The review reports a paradox: non-Western cultures consistently exhibit heightened somatic focus and awareness across contexts, while also showing less interoceptive accuracy in laboratory studies. It discusses cultural schemas and epistemologies as proposed mechanisms and examines contemplative practices as possible interventions for bodily awareness, with consequences for somatization, body dysmorphia, eating disorders, and anxiety disorders.

Abstract

This review examines cross-cultural differences in interoception and the role of culturally bound epistemologies, historical traditions, and contemplative practices to assess four aspects of culture and interoception: (1) the extent to which members from Western and non-Western cultural groups exhibit differential levels of interoceptive accuracy and somatic awareness; (2) the mechanistic origins that can explain these cultural differences, (3) culturally bound behavioral practices that have been empirically shown to affect interoception, and (4) consequences for culturally bound psychopathologies. The following outlines the scope of the scientific review. Part 1 reviews studies on cultural variation in spontaneous somatic word use, linguistic expressions, traditional medical practices, and empirical laboratory studies to assess the evidence for cultural differences in somatic processes. Integration of these findings suggests a startling paradox: on the one hand, non-Western cultures consistently exhibit heightened somatic focus and awareness across a variety of contexts; on the other hand, non-Western cultures also exhibit less interoceptive accuracy in laboratory studies. Part 2 discusses the various mechanistic explanations that have been proposed to explain these cultural differences in somatic awareness and interoceptive accuracy, focusing on cultural schemas and epistemologies. Part 3 addresses the behavioral and contemplative practices that have been proposed as possible "interventions," or methods of cultivating bodily awareness and perceptual accuracy. Finally, Part 4 reviews the consequences of interoception for psychopathology, including somatization, body dysmorphia, eating disorders, and anxiety disorders.

Comparable studies

Other narrative reviews on meditation, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Cited by 7

and 2 more in the library

Cites 6

and 1 more in the library

Explore topics