Skip to content

Accuracy and performance of the state-based Φ and liveliness measures of information integration.

David Gamez, Igor Aleksander

Consciousness and Cognition December 2011 DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.05.016 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key points The authors propose liveliness as an alternative state-based measure of information integration that uses causal relationships between neurons to identify areas of maximum information integration. In comparisons across test networks, liveliness was a reasonable approximation to Balduzzi and Tononi's state-based Φ for some network topologies and had much more scalable performance.

Abstract

A number of people have suggested that there is a link between information integration and consciousness, and a number of algorithms for calculating information integration have been put forward. The most recent of these is Balduzzi and Tononi's state-based Φ algorithm, which has factorial dependencies that severely limit the number of neurons that can be analyzed. To address this issue an alternative state-based measure known as liveliness has been developed, which uses the causal relationships between neurons to identify the areas of maximum information integration. This paper outlines the state-based Φ and liveliness algorithms and sets out a number of test networks that were used to compare their accuracy and performance. The results show that liveliness is a reasonable approximation to state-based Φ for some network topologies, and it has a much more scalable performance than state-based Φ.

Citations in the library

Explore topics