Disentangling conscious from unconscious cognitive processing with event-related EEG potentials.
Benjamin Rohaut, Lionel Naccache
Revue Neurologique 2017 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2017.08.001 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Review Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Non-communicating brain-injured patients with disorders of consciousness, alongside healthy subjects |
| Measures | MMN, N400, P3b, P600/LPC |
| Keywords | Consciousness disorders Erps Mmn N400 P300 P600 Semantics Unconscious |
| Key findings | The authors propose a two-stage serial model in which unconscious processing of sounds and words occurs at an earlier stage (indexed by MMN and N400), while conscious access to the corresponding representation shares a similar later neural signature (P3b and P600/LPC). They argue these bedside EEG markers can help improve diagnosis and prognosis of consciousness recovery and can constrain theoretical models of consciousness. |
Abstract
By looking for properties of consciousness, cognitive neuroscience studies have dramatically enlarged the scope of unconscious cognitive processing. This emerging knowledge inspired the development of new approaches allowing clinicians to probe and disentangle conscious from unconscious cognitive processes in non-communicating brain-injured patients both in terms of behaviour and brain activity. This information is extremely valuable in order to improve diagnosis and prognosis in such patients both at acute and chronic settings. Reciprocally, the growing observations coming from such patients suffering from disorders of consciousness provide valuable constraints to theoretical models of consciousness. In this review we chose to illustrate these recent developments by focusing on brain signals recorded with EEG at bedside in response to auditory stimuli. More precisely, we present the respective EEG markers of unconscious and conscious processing of two classes of auditory stimuli (sounds and words). We show that in both cases, conscious access to the corresponding representation (e.g.: auditory regularity and verbal semantic content) share a similar neural signature (P3b and P600/LPC) that can be distinguished from unconscious processing occurring during an earlier stage (MMN and N400). We propose a two-stage serial model of processing and discuss how unconscious and conscious signatures can be measured at bedside providing relevant informations for both diagnosis and prognosis of consciousness recovery. These two examples emphasize how fruitful can be the bidirectional approach exploring cognition in healthy subjects and in brain-damaged patients.
Citations in the library
Cited by 4
- "Sentio ergo est": Unmasking the psychological realities of emotional misperception. Perception 2025
- How is a psychotherapeutic process like a psychedelic drug? Neurocognitive evidence for a novel mechanism of action with Regenerating Images in Memory. Frontiers in Psychology 2025
- Neural mechanisms of awareness of action. PNAS Nexus July 1, 2026
- Apical amplification-a cellular mechanism of conscious perception? Neuroscience of Consciousness 2021
Cites 7
- Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State Science September 7, 2006
- Dynamic Interactions between Top-Down Expectations and Conscious Awareness. Journal of Neuroscience February 28, 2018
- Toward a computational theory of conscious processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology December 29, 2013
- Neural signature of the conscious processing of auditory regularities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences February 3, 2009
- Brain Dynamics Underlying the Nonlinear Threshold for Access to Consciousness PLoS Biology September 25, 2007
and 2 more in the library