Skip to content

The “Hidden Observer” as the Cognitive Unconscious During Hypnosis

Noémi Császár, Felix Scholkmann, Gábor Kapócs, István Bókkon

Activitas Nervosa Superior September 1, 2016 DOI: 10.1007/bf03379735 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Citations 5
Key points Argues that no single perspective fully explains hypnosis and that a synthesis of altered-state, sociopsychological, neurocognitive, and sociocognitive accounts is needed. The authors propose that the "hidden observer" emerges principally in highly susceptible subjects and might be nothing other than the cognitive unconscious.

Abstract

Abstract The question of how to define and explain hypnosis is still not completely answered. Most of the theories of hypnosis are based on describing it as an altered state of consciousness; others focus on intrapersonal and interpersonal aspects, sociopsychological, neurocognitive or sociocognitive processes. More detailed explanation of hypnosis requires a synthesis of these various perspectives — a task for future research. Recent experiments are in agreement with Braid’s concept of hypnosis (published already in 1843) defining hypnosis as a process enhancing or depressing neural activity as well as changing functional connectivity among brain regions; the brain regions involved in mental imagery are thought to be central for hypnosis. In the present article we suggest that the “hidden observer” under hypnosis might be due to the cognitive unconscious and that this special state emerges principally in highly susceptible subjects. Explicitly, the “hidden observer” might be nothing other than the cognitive unconscious.

Citations in the library

Explore topics