Skip to content

Blindsight: recent and historical controversies on the blindness of blindsight.

Morten Overgaard

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science November 2012 DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1194 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Review Peer reviewed
Key findings The history of blindsight research involves changing experimental paradigms and very few patients. Experiments since the 1970s suggest a distinction between visual functions and visual experience, but newer methods and introspective reports have cast doubt on the 'blindness' of blindsight. The author suggests a cautious conclusion, as current research can be interpreted in different ways.

Abstract

The phenomenon 'blindsight' has received much interest from neuroscientists, philosophers, and psychologists during the last decades. Several researchers seem to agree that blindsight might be of great importance in the ambition to find neural correlates of consciousness. However, the history of blindsight is a history of changing experimental paradigms and very few patients. In late 19th century, researchers debated why lesions to primary visual cortex seemingly left some visual abilities intact in animals, while human patients reported to be blind. From the 1970s until today, experiments have attempted to compare measures of conscious and unconscious perception, suggesting a distinction between visual functions and visual experience. However, more recently, newer methods and an interest in introspective reports have cast doubts about the 'blindness' of blindsight. A cautious conclusion is suggested, though current research can be interpreted in different ways. WIREs Cogn Sci 2012 doi: 10.1002/wcs.1194 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.

Citations in the library