Between-Subject Variability in the Breaking Continuous Flash Suppression Paradigm: Potential Causes, Consequences, and Solutions.
Frontiers in Psychology 2017 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00437 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Reanalysis of existing datasets plus a new dataset Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Assumption of normality Binocular rivalry Consciousness Continuous flash suppression Individual differences Normalization Response times Visual awareness |
| Key points | The authors report that the between-condition response-time difference in b-CFS tasks is highly correlated with participants' overall suppression durations and trial-to-trial response-time variability. They propose a latency-normalization method that removes between-subject variability in suppression duration from the effect of interest and produces response-time difference distributions better suited for parametric testing, and they tentatively link variability and suppression duration to prolonged shallow suppression. |
Abstract
A recent focus in the field of consciousness research involves investigating the propensity of initially non-conscious visual information to gain access to consciousness. A critical tool for measuring conscious access is the so-called breaking continuous flash suppression paradigm (b-CFS). In this paradigm, a high contrast dynamic pattern is presented to one eye, thereby temporarily suppressing a target stimulus that is presented to the other eye. The time it takes for observers to report (e.g., the location of) the initially suppressed stimulus provides a measure of conscious access. Typical observations in b-CFS studies include the finding that upright faces are released from suppression faster than inverted faces, and the finding that stimuli that match the current content of visual working memory are released from suppression faster than mismatching stimuli. Interestingly, the extent to which observers exhibit these effects varies extensively (in the range of hundreds of milliseconds). By re-analyzing existing datasets and a new dataset we establish that the difference in RTs between conditions in b-CFS tasks (i.e., the effect of interest) is highly correlated with participants' overall suppression durations, and with their trial-to-trial variability in RTs. We advocate the usage of a simple latency- normalization method, which (1) removes the between-subject variability in suppression duration from the effect of interest, while (2) providing distributions of RT differences that are better suited for parametric testing. We next compare this latency-normalization method to two other transformations that are widely applied on within-subject RT data (z-transformations and log-transformations). Finally, we tentatively discuss how trial-to-trial variability and overall suppression duration might relate to prolonged phases of shallow suppression that are more prone to modulations of conscious access.
Citations in the library
Cited by 3
- Top-down enhancement of nonconscious gaze perception by working memory representations of social cues. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review March 12, 2026
- An Experimental Study of Subliminal Self-Face Processing in Depersonalization-Derealization Disorder. Brain Sciences November 22, 2022
- Hide and seek: Directing top-down attention is not sufficient for accelerating conscious access. Cortex 2020
Cites 4
- Psychophysical "blinding" methods reveal a functional hierarchy of unconscious visual processing. Consciousness and Cognition September 2015
- Visual sensitivity underlying changes in visual consciousness. Current Biology August 10, 2010
- Seeing the invisible: the scope and limits of unconscious processing in binocular rivalry. Progress in Neurobiology April 2009
- Is consciousness a gradual phenomenon? Evidence for an all-or-none bifurcation during the attentional blink. Psychological Science November 1, 2004