Skip to content

Understanding Consciousness as Data Compression

Phil Maguire, Rebecca Maguire, Philippe Moser

Journal of Cognitive Science March 1, 2016 DOI: 10.17791/jcs.2016.17.1.63 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Citations 24
Key points Argues that consciousness is a "language-complete" phenomenon that resists scientific description because the language of science is too weak, and proposes that data compression from theoretical computer science can formalize its limits. Using algorithmic information theory, the authors prove that integrated experience cannot be achieved by a computable process, offering new perspectives on intelligent behavior, the combination problem, and the hard problem of subjective experience.

Abstract

In this article we explore the idea that consciousness is a language-complete \nphenomenon, that is, one which is as difficult to formalise as the foundations \nof language itself. We posit that the reason consciousness resists scientific \ndescription is because the language of science is too weak; its power to \nrender phenomena objective is exhausted by the sophistication of the brain’s \narchitecture. However, this does not mean that there is nothing to say about \nconsciousness. We propose that the phenomenon can be expressed in terms of \ndata compression, a well-defined concept from theoretical computer science \nwhich acknowledges and formalises the limits of objective representation. Data \ncompression focuses on the intersection between the uncomputable and the finite. \nIt has a number of fundamental theoretical applications, giving rise, for example, \nto a universal definition of intelligence (Hutter, 2004), a universal theory of prior \nprobability, as well as a universal theory of inductive inference (Solomonoff, \n1964). Here we explore the merits of considering consciousness in such terms, \nshowing how the data compression approach can provide new perspectives \non intelligent behaviour, the combination problem, and the hard problem of \nsubjective experience. In particular, we use the tools of algorithmic information \ntheory to prove that integrated experience cannot be achieved by a computable \nprocess.

Citations in the library

Explore topics