Skip to content

A clinical pharmacokinetic microdosing study of docetaxel with Japanese patients with cancer.

Ken-ichi Fujita, Etsuko Yoshino, Kaori Kawara, Kazuya Maeda, Hiroyuki Kusuhara, Yuichi Sugiyama, Taro Yokoyama, Toshikado Kaneta, Hiroo Ishida, Yasutsuna Sasaki

Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology October 2015 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-015-2844-2 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Pharmacokinetic study Peer reviewed
Sample size 9
Population Japanese patients with cancer
Intervention Docetaxel
Dose microdose: 100 μg/patient; therapeutic dose: 60-75 mg m(-2)
Duration Microdose on day 1, therapeutic dose on day 8
Measures liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, two-compartment pharmacokinetic model, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-inf)
Topics Microdosing
Keywords Docetaxel Microdose study Pharmacokinetics Α1-acid glycoprotein
Key points Docetaxel clearance was 1.8-fold higher at the therapeutic dose than at the microdose (P = 0.0041), indicating marginal nonlinearity, which the authors attribute to saturation of plasma protein binding. Because the difference was within twofold, they conclude that microdose pharmacokinetics allow practically acceptable prediction of therapeutic-dose docetaxel disposition.

Abstract

Whether microdosing studies can be used to evaluate the human pharmacokinetics of new anticancer drugs remains unclear. The disposition of docetaxel in cancer patients is linear in terms of dose proportionality. We examined whether the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel in a clinically relevant therapeutic dose could be predicted from the pharmacokinetics of a microdose of docetaxel in Japanese patients with cancer. A microdose of docetaxel (100 μg/patient) was given by 5-min intravenous infusion on day 1, followed by a therapeutic dose of docetaxel (60-75 mg m(-2)), given by 1-h intravenous infusion on day 8. Plasma docetaxel was analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. A two-compartment pharmacokinetic model was used to calculate the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-inf). Nine patients received both a microdose and therapeutic dose of docetaxel. The AUC0-inf after microdosing was 3640 ± 1150 ng h L(-1), while that after therapeutic dosing adjusted to 100 mg/patient was 2230 ± 757 µg h L(-1). The ratio of docetaxel clearance in therapeutic dose to that in microdose was 1.8 (P = 0.0041). Plasma α1-acid glycoprotein concentrations negatively correlated with docetaxel clearance at therapeutic dose, whereas the trend was weak at microdose. Docetaxel clearance showed marginal nonlinearity between microdose and therapeutic dose, presumably because of saturation of plasma protein binding; however, the magnitude was within twofold, allowing practically acceptable extrapolation.

Comparable studies

Other experimental studies on microdosing, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Microdosing Clinical Study: Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacogenomic (SLCO2B1), and Interaction (Grapefruit Juice) Profiles of Celiprolol Following the Oral Microdose and Therapeutic Dose Healthy volunteers matched for SLCO2B1 genotype 2011 Pharmacokinetic study n = 30
Microdosing psychedelics has no impact on cognitive function in naturalistic settings Participants during their microdosing regimen 2023 Observational within-subjects design n = 17
PK and PK / PD Modeling of Bcl2 Inhibitor S65487 in Patients With AML and Investigation of Nonlinearity With Microdosing Phase I/II cancer patients and healthy volunteers 2026 Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling study
Technical pen-based printhead for high-precision microdosing of personalized therapies. 2026 Experimental study
Analysis of Serotonin in Caenorhabditis Elegans Subjected to Micro-Dosing with Psilocybin| Iris Publishers Caenorhabditis elegans 2025 Experimental study

Citations in the library

Explore topics