Skip to content

The Engineering Thesis in Machine Consciousness

Piotr Bołtuć

Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 2012 DOI: 10.5840/techne201216214 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key points Argues that if non-reductive naturalism about first-person consciousness ("h-consciousness") holds, then we should eventually be able to understand how such consciousness operates and is produced, meaning it can in principle be engineered. This is presented as distinct from bridging the explanatory gap or solving Chalmers's hard problem.

Abstract

I argue here that consciousness can be engineered. The claim that functional consciousness can be engineered has been persuasively put forth in regards to first-person functional consciousness; robots, for instance, can recognize colors, though there is still much debate about details of this sort of consciousness. Such consciousness has now become one of the meanings of the term phenomenal consciousness (e.g., as used by Franklin and Baars). Yet, we extend the argument beyond the tradition of behaviorist or functional reductive views on consciousness that still predominate within cognitive science. If Nagel-Chalmers-Block-style non-reductive naturalism about first-person consciousness (h-consciousness) holds true, then, eventually we should be able to understand how such consciousness operates and how it gets produced (this is not the same as bridging the explanatory gap or solving Chalmers’s hard problem of consciousness). If so, the consciousness it involves can in principle be engineered.

Citations in the library

Explore topics